Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Natural Zippers

"God isn't compatible with machinery and scientific medicine and universal happiness. You must make your choice. Our civilization has chosen machinery and medicine and happiness. That's why I have to keep these books locked up in the safe. They're smut. People would be shocked if..." The Savage interrupted him. "But isn't it natural to feel there's a God?" "You might as well ask if it's natural to do up one's trousers with zippers."
-- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World This passage illustrates - and explodes - one of the most conventional arguments for deity - "I feel that there is a God." Instinct. We rely heavily on instinct (and what we like to refer to as intuition, which is really just instinct given a nicer name to make it sound reasonable instead of impulsive) to guide us through the perils of our daily existence. Instinct can be good - it keeps us from falling off high objects, walking through bad neighborhoods at night, and being eaten by predators. But instinct has also led us very far astray. The world changes faster than our chemical and genetic makeup. Sometimes, instinct adapts. Most of us are capable of riding in a car at 50 mph or riding an elevator to the tenth floor without panicking. Most of us understand that despite our body's craving for fat and sugar, too much of it is bad for us. We relearn our instincts. We come to think of these things as normal, as natural. Like zippers on trousers. We want to think that there's a God because it gives things purpose - and if things have purpose, then it isn't our fault if they are out of our control. At least, we think, they're in someone's control. And if that someone happens to be benevolent and omnipotent, well, then, we don't have to feel bad about all the horrific things that take place in the world, because they're all under control. God is our psychic security blanket. Sometimes, we need to let those instincts go. To accept that zippers are as natural as trousers, and that trousers are as natural as rainstorms.

Friday, October 07, 2011

If Ignorance is Bliss... Idiocy is Heaven

All that is solid melts into air, all that is holy is profaned, and man is at last compelled to face with sober senses his real conditions of life and his relations with his kind. -- Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels, Communist Manifesto

My question in response to this is fairly basic - why, exactly, is this a bad thing? If religion is the opiate of the masses, why object to its removal? Is the truth of human existence really so horrific that we would rather willfully deny it by covering it over with a veneer of an idyllic illusion?

Of course we would. We live in a world constructed around fantasy - the fantasy of religion, of the "American Dream," of a non-existent harmonious nuclear family. We surround ourselves with fictionalized accounts of heroism, drama, and knights in shining armor. We play games with no basis in the real world, full of dragons and aliens and space marines; we watch movies and read books about people that never existed in worlds that never could exist; we pretend to ourselves that when we die, we will go to a magical place where everyone is young and beautiful and where we'll be surrounded by our deceased pets.

This is not to say that I have any objects to fantasy itself - I'm an avid reader of fantasy, sci fi, and fiction. I have, in fact, made a career out of it. I love movies. I love video games. But I love them in full awareness that they are fiction. Yes, at the core of every fiction is some kernel of truth and commentary about the real world, but that's just the point. They know they're fiction and have accepted that as part of their essential existence.

In Marx's view, we should be allowed to believe our illusions are real. We shouldn't go through life with the assumption that human beings are fundamentally selfish creatures. We should continue to believe that there is a reward after death, that our interactions aren't governed by self-interest, that we aren't a group of social animals that seeks ways to place itself above other groups of social animals by means of race, class, gender, or cultural choice.

We are. We need to get over a lot of that - someone's socioeconomic or ethnic background should not and does not make them a better or worse human being than I am - but we can't stop committing acts of bias and bigotry until we accept the fact that we do not treat each other as equals. We should, but we don't. And I am willing to admit that I am as guilty as the next person of considering myself "better" than someone without access to the education I've had. I dislike stupidity - but ignorance is better than willful idiocy. And to deny the fact that our "illusions" help to perpetuate classism, racism, homophobia, misogyny, and so on is willful idiocy. We know better. Now we should start acting like it.